1.
National tools that are used by all universities
(the ‘Academic Infrastructure’) including Frameworks for higher education
qualifications, Subject Benchmark Statements and a sector-wide Code of practice for the assurance
of academic quality and standards in
higher education;
2.
Universities’
own systems for ensuring their standards are right and quality is maintained, such
as procedures for the design and review of courses and the use of external
examiners;
3.
Independent external review of each university by
the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA), resulting in published
reports;
4.
Effective engagement with students and employers,
including professional, statutory and regulatory bodies, which helps to shape
what universities do;
5.
Mechanisms to support improvements in quality,
for example by learning from the experience of others, sharing good practice
and ways of supporting professionalism in teaching;
6.
Measures to address complaints.
These features provide the backbone of the quality standards
assessment. This document helps clarify the way this system works. http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/Publications/Documents/44806UniUK_guide_lores.pdf
or for the summary see: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/Publications/Documents/44835UniUK_Summary_lores.pdf
There is an increasing request for
transparency of the HE system and provisions. This seems to be another way of
demonstrating the value of UK universities.
No comments:
Post a Comment